Jeremy Huston
Staples, K. "Technical Communication from 1950-1998: Where are we now?" Technical Communication Quarterly, 8 (1999): 153-164.
In her article, Staples argues that as TC theory and research has matured in the frame for her article, but with that maturity has come growth away from its original industrial/engineering foundations, creating a split in the discipline not unlike the literature/composition schism of the first part of the 20th century. She tracks TC history from 1950-1998, treading over some of the same ground as Connors and citing him several times, then going a little further to document TCs flourishing in the the early 80s, intradisciplinary problems, and the real solidification of the discipline in the 90s. This history has led to a more theoretically supported, researched, and developed discipline, but it has also heightened the academy/industry, theory/praxis split. To solve this, she advocates for open dialogue between industry and the academy, as well as a broader, more inclusive research agenda to accommodate a more inclusive TC pedagogy and a more diverse discipline.
I'm quite curious to read the article and examine her recommendations for open dialogue ... what does that look like, and how will it actually work to resolve "the academy/industry, theory/praxis split."
ReplyDelete